Potterview #2: Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, from what I have seen, is considered to be one of the worst books in the series. And yes, it’s one of the earlier books, so the plot is a simple mystery and not very deeply involved with the larger overarching story. But I thought it was better than Sorcerer’s Stone at least.

I liked the plot of this book a lot better than Sorcerer’s Stone’s. The mysterious monster and the Petrified victims were very creepy, and definitely grabbed my attention when I was a kid. When Hermione became a victim, and when Ginny was kidnapped, emotional incentive was added. I cared a lot more about the outcome of this book when I was a kid because characters I knew and liked had been threatened. And of course, the diary and the basilisk tie into the overarching Horcrux storyline.

The characters are also developing a bit more. Hermione is a particular standout. Her suggestion to brew Polyjuice Potion in the girls’ bathroom is a defining moment. We already know that it is uncharacteristic for her to suggest breaking rules, but this event teaches us that she’s willing to do so in order to protect others. It’s also nice to get more background on Hagrid and the reason he was expelled from Hogwarts.

I am, however, starting to notice some plot holes. Magic that is used in later books is not used here in cases where it would be applicable because Rowling has not come up with it yet. For example, Harry is suspected to be the Heir of Slytherin, and it causes him a lot of trouble. But couldn’t Dumbledore just use Veritaserum to find out whether or not he’s guilty?

I love seeing the books get darker and more complicated, and I’m excited for Prisoner of Azkaban.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Potterview #2: Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

  1. b.h.quinn says:

    I don’t much care for the second book. It’s slow and a bit boring without much new material to engross me. The first book drew me into the series and the third book is the first one I truly loved. Re-reading the books, I find the style of the first two to be much too young for me to truly enjoy like I did when I first read them. Maybe if I’d have to wait for the third book, I would have had more time to fall for the second. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s